ShinJu
June 30, 2010 @ 8:01 am · Filed under Life, Who Knows

False Spring 1
Too close to my end
You awoke feelings long dead
Best we never met
False Spring 2
A single branch
blooms amidst the frost
Then, freezes
June 30, 2010 @ 8:01 am · Filed under Life, Who Knows

False Spring 1
Too close to my end
You awoke feelings long dead
Best we never met
False Spring 2
A single branch
blooms amidst the frost
Then, freezes
February 14, 2010 @ 9:40 pm · Filed under Data, History, Life, Reading, Who Knows
Recently, I’ve been reading An Introduction to General Systems Thinking (Silver Anniversary Edition). It’s a fascinating book, with insights on almost every page. Here’s the author’s thoughts on the problems of interpreting observations:
Whenever we observe a state that is both conspicuous and improbable, we are faced with a quandary. Do we believe our observation or do we invoke some special hypothesis?
…
Conservatism is introduced into the scientific investigation by the very assumption that observations must be consistent with present theories. An observation is more likely to be discarded as “erroneous” if it is out of consonance with theory. … The complete substitution of theory for observation is, of course, not scientific. Even worse is going through the motions of observing, but discarding as “spurious” every observation that does not fit theory.
…
This, then, is the problem. Raw, detailed observation of the world is just too rich a diet for science. No two situations are exactly alike unless we make them so. Every license plate we see is a miracle
…
“A statue is a situation which can be recognized if it occurs again.” But no state will ever occur again if we don’t lump many states into one “state.” Thus, in order to learn at all, we must forego some potential discrimination of states, some possibility of learning everything.
…
Science does not, and cannot, deal with miracles. Science deals only with repetitive events. Each science has to have characteristic ways of lumping the states of the systems it observes, in order to generate repetition. How does it lump? Not in arbitrary ways, but in ways determined by its past experience — ways that “work” for that science. Gradually, as the science matures, the “brain” is traded for the “eye,” until it becomes almost impossible to break a scientific paradigm (a traditional way of lumping) with mere empirical observations.
Now, if the issues outlined in the above quote are a problem for the hard sciences, they are a disaster in fuzzier disciplines like history, economics, and politics. They also have implications for business. Most of the time, you will find, that there is no widespread agreement among your co-workers on the state you are facing. And, if you all do agree, it’s probably just that your viewpoints are not really independent, not that you are all correct.
October 6, 2009 @ 7:46 am · Filed under Life, Web 2.0, Who Knows
Well, the FTC has just laid down a new policy requiring bloggers to reveal any payment (or free stuff) they receive to blog about any subject. For details, check out this post from Larry. So, here’s my disclosure. I’m ashamed to have to admit that I am so lacking in influence that nobody has ever given me anything, or paid me, to endorse anything. Too bad I’m not Mager.
September 14, 2009 @ 7:12 pm · Filed under Ironic, Life, Weird, Who Knows
Today was an extremely irritating day. Here’s a short list of all the things that irritated me today:
In any event, tomorrow can only get better.
February 4, 2009 @ 8:31 pm · Filed under Movies, Who Knows
I saw the movie The Wrestler the other day, and I was blown away by the quality of Mickey Rourke’s acting. Here’s a clip of some wrestlers talking about the movie:
January 4, 2009 @ 2:00 pm · Filed under History, Reading, Who Knows
The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy. Definitive account of the Nazi economy.
Chief Culprit: Stalin’s Grand Design to Start World War II (Blue Jacket Bks). Convincingly argues that Stalin was planning an offensive against Germany timed for late 1941.
Chamberlain and the Lost Peace. About as good a case as can be made defending Chamberlain’s foreign policy.
Hitler and Appeasement: The British Attempt to Prevent the Second World War. Good assessment of the politics of appeasement in the 1930s.
The Abolition of Britain: From Winston Churchill to Princess Diana. Overly nostalgic, but biting attack on what new labor has wrought.
Hitler’s Panzers East: World War II Reinterpreted. Argues that Hitler could have won the war in the East by concentrating on Moscow. Neglects logistics and ultimately unconvincing.
There’s actually a thread that connects all these, and I’ll write a longer post on the subject later.
November 23, 2008 @ 5:20 pm · Filed under Food, Who Knows
By popular demand, here’s my recipe for Quince-pear tart:
1. Mix 8 cups of water, 1 cup of sugar, some sliced ginger, and a pinch of cinnamon. Bring them to a boil. Peel, core and slice up two large quinces. Throw them in the boiling water, and simmer for fifteen minutes.
2. While the quinces are simmering, peel, core, and slice up four pears. Heat the oven to 350 degrees. Coat the pie crust with butter, slit, and put the pan lined with pie crust in the oven to bake for 10 minutes.
3. Mix the quinces, pears, a half cup of brown sugar, a half stick of melted butter, and enough of the sugar water you boiled the quinces in to make a filling with a nice consistency.
4. Fill the pie crust with filling, and bake at 350 for 20 minutes.
November 1, 2008 @ 8:50 am · Filed under Ironic, Life, Who Knows
Question: What does this sign really say?

Answer: “I am not in the office at the moment. Please don’t send any work to be translated” – Read More.
October 30, 2008 @ 11:33 am · Filed under Ironic, Web 2.0, Who Knows
Here’s an email I just received from Google Adsense:
Dear Publisher,
We understand that the recent economic turmoil has created a lot of uncertainty in the lives of AdSense publishers. During these difficult times, we’re continuing to invest in innovations that improve publisher monetization and advertiser value in the content network.
We’re focusing on further developing our product offerings and boosting ad performance for publishers. We recently announced advancements in AdSense for search and experiments to make ads more effective. We’re bringing DoubleClick technologies to AdSense publishers, and we’ll continue to launch new products and features. We’re also continuing to improve our offerings for AdWords advertisers, making it easier for them to target the Google content network. Features for advertisers, such as the new display ad builder, are designed to improve ad performance on AdSense publisher sites.
We’ll keep driving technological progress, but our best asset will always be our publisher partners. The strength of AdSense lies in the value of the content you bring to users and the quality of the sites you bring to advertisers. Our success is tied to yours. We look forward to partnering with you for the long term, and remain dedicated to helping you succeed.
Sincerely,
Kim Scott
Director AdSense Online Sales & OperationsGoogle Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
If they really want to reassure me, they should just tell me what the split is on my ad clicks.
UPDATE: If I was a real blogger here’s the kind of post I would have written about this email.
October 25, 2008 @ 11:25 am · Filed under Life, Real Life, Who Knows
I used to have a blog on WordPress.com called Slantwise. I finally moved all the posts from there over to this blog. Here’s my favorite post from Slantwise: On The Web, You Can’t Escape Your Past.
"Nihil est incertius vulgo"